
The 7 Degrees of Growth
Why strategy, not activity, determines what comes next
Most organizations do not stall because they lack ideas, effort, or ambition. They stall because growth becomes fragmented. New initiatives accumulate, teams stay busy, marketing activity increases, and yet momentum slows.
That pattern is not a motivation problem. It is a strategy problem.
Over time, organizations default to doing more because they are unsure what actually drives progress. The Seven Degrees of Growth exist to correct that mistake. Each degree represents a fundamentally different way growth happens, moving from strengthening what already exists to reshaping how the organization competes altogether.
Understanding the difference is the first step toward intentional growth.
Degree 1: Deepen Value with Existing Customers
Growth is not always about finding new customers. Often, it comes from seeing existing customers more clearly.
Most organizations measure customer satisfaction at the wrong moment. They ask for feedback when the experience is at its high point, right after a deal closes or a product ships. At that moment, everything feels positive. What they miss is what happens after the sale, when friction, confusion, or disappointment quietly erode trust.
Case Study: A mortgage lender learned this when post closing surveys showed high satisfaction, yet retention lagged. The surveys were sent before the loan was sold, not after the customer experienced ongoing service. Once leadership mapped the full journey, they saw where confidence broke down and fixed the experience that mattered most.
The insight is simple but often ignored. Satisfaction is not loyalty. Loyalty shows up after the transaction is complete. Degree 1 growth comes from uncovering where value leaks out of the experience and fixing those moments deliberately.
This is not expansion. It is discipline.
Degree 2: Attract New Customers in Existing Markets
A strong product is not enough if the message reaches the wrong audience.
Degree 2 growth breaks down when organizations speak to users instead of decision makers. Sales teams often focus on the people closest to the product, assuming influence equals authority. In reality, many purchasing decisions are made elsewhere.
Case Study: A biotech equipment manufacturer experienced this firsthand. Their product consistently lost to cheaper, less effective alternatives. The issue was not quality or price. It was audience alignment. The sales conversation targeted lab technicians, while executives controlled purchasing decisions. Once the value was reframed for leadership and the sales team was equipped accordingly, outcomes changed.
Growth often comes from addressing the decision maker you have been missing. Degree 2 is about aligning message, authority, and outcomes. It sharpens focus without changing the business model itself.
Degree 3: Develop New Products or Services
New offerings fail more often than leaders expect, not because they lack merit, but because they lack positioning.
Organizations assume that innovation speaks for itself. It does not. A new product only works when customers clearly understand who it is for, what problem it solves, and why it matters now.
Case Study: A global ministry learned this after a high quality devotional series underperformed. The content was strong, but the audience and problem were loosely defined. Once those elements were clarified, engagement followed.
Degree 3 growth requires discipline before launch. Right audience. Right problem. Right value.
Degree 4: Redefine How Value Is Delivered
Sometimes growth does not require something new. It requires delivering what already exists differently.
Many organizations sit on untapped value because offerings are fragmented, poorly timed, or misaligned with how customers actually buy. Innovation is assumed to mean invention, when often it means redesigning delivery.
Case Study: A global industrial manufacturer discovered that bundling existing components into complete systems created advantage. But the breakthrough only occurred after sales strategy and messaging were aligned to support the new delivery model.
Degree 4 growth reframes innovation as experience design. It changes how value is felt, not just what is offered.
Degree 5: Expand into New Geographic Markets
Geographic expansion fails when organizations assume identity transfers automatically.
New markets require translation, not duplication. Customers evaluate relevance through their own context, not the organization’s history. The challenge is expanding reach without losing coherence.
Case Study: A company moving from a rural market into an urban one faced this tension directly. By evolving its story rather than abandoning it, the organization built trust in the new market while retaining credibility in the old.
Growth works when the brand adapts without drifting.
Degree 6: Enter Adjacent Industries
When core markets slow, organizations often overreact. They chase reinvention instead of leverage.
Degree 6 growth asks a different question. Who else needs what we already do well?
By repositioning existing capabilities for adjacent industries, organizations can reduce risk while opening new revenue paths. This approach does not require operational overhaul. It requires insight, clarity, and disciplined positioning.
Growth accelerates when leaders recognize where their strengths already apply.
Degree 7: Redefine or Reshape the Industry
The highest degree of growth questions assumptions customers no longer accept.
Industry disruption does not always start with a new product. It often starts with removing unnecessary friction. When organizations redesign how customers access value, they change the rules of competition.
Case Study: A medical organization unlocked growth by bypassing traditional referral pathways and aligning directly with patient behavior. The service did not change. The path to value did.
Degree 7 growth emerges when leaders rethink systems customers are forced to navigate.
Why the Degrees Matter
Most organizations do not fail at growth because they choose the wrong tactics. They fail because they choose the wrong degree of growth for the problem in front of them.
When leaders skip ahead, activity increases but leverage disappears. When they slow down long enough to diagnose where growth is actually constrained, progress becomes intentional.
The question is not whether your organization can grow. The question is whether you are clear about which degree of growth you need right now. If you aren't sure, I'd love to talk to you about that.
